Aelred (the character) in St. Aelred, Spiritual Friendship.
Cited on EveTushnet.com, who comments, wisely, “I have been thinking about the spiritual harm done when I am too proud to be a burden on others.”
Aelred (the character) in St. Aelred, Spiritual Friendship.
Cited on EveTushnet.com, who comments, wisely, “I have been thinking about the spiritual harm done when I am too proud to be a burden on others.”
A philosophy professor I had in college once commented on how the dominant technology of the day becomes the dominant image we have of our mind and rationality and the workings of our bodies. If gears and pulleys run our machines, we tend to think of ourselves in terms of gears and pulleys.
If planting, harvest, and weather make up our way of life, elements like air and fire and water will suffice to explain the mystery of the human body. If computers or chemicals dominate our work and study, we frame our thinking about our bodies in terms of chemistry and computing. We are so sure that this is indeed the way our bodies work, and then the next age giggles at our simplicity and replaces the image.
” —Paul Gregory Alms, “Death Unplugged” (via settledthingsstrange)“It is my judgment, therefore, that we should not make it difficult for the Gentiles who are turning to God.” James was saying: We’ve got a whole world out there to win, and we’ve got to do our best to make sure that people outside the pale of the cross, who are different than we are, are made to feel as welcomed as possible. While we’re going to adhere to the key convictions of what the gospel is, we are not going to add one scintilla more to the gospel than is necessary, so people will feel welcome whether they are Jews or Gentiles.
As we move into the 21st century, we have to memorize verse 19. In too many places today, the church is making it harder and harder for people outside the faith to come in and hear the gospel. We don’t mean to do it, but we make it difficult for the young to make commitments. We make it difficult for the person who has a postmodern mind to hear the gospel. We don’t hear ourselves, but all too often we violate James’ proposal, and we inadvertently make it difficult for people to hear the gospel.
” —Gordon MacDonald, The Right Way to Handle Church Conflict, on Acts 15.19
Christian subculture is problematic
It may be that when we no longer know what to do,
we have come to our real work
and when we no longer know which way to go,
we have begun our real journey.
The mind that is not baffled is not employed.
The impeded stream is the one that sings.
“Isn’t Mrs. Parry efficient?”
“Extremely,” he answered. “And God redeem her. But nicely.”
” —Charles Williams, Descent into HellProlegomena to Any Future Metapsychics | John C. Wright
This can be profitably extrapolated any number of ways.
What we are left to surmise, then, is that the doctrine of randomness has simply been projected onto the phenomena of organic life as a matter of pre-existing philosophical commitment.
In any case, it is startling to realize that the entire brief for demoting human beings, and organisms in general, to meaningless scraps of molecular machinery — a demotion that fuels the long-running science-religion wars and that, as “shocking” revelation, supposedly stands on a par with Copernicus’ heliocentric proposal — rests on the vague conjunction of two scarcely creditable concepts: the randomness of mutations and the fitness of organisms. And, strangely, this shocking revelation has been sold to us in the context of a descriptive biological literature that, from the molecular level on up, remains almost nothing but a documentation of the meaningfully organized, goal-directed stories of living creatures.
” —Steve Talbott, Evolution and the Randomness of Life
Mr. Talbott is not, so far as I can yet see, a Christian, but his discussion here, as he finally turns his attention to the question of neo-Darwinism, is as cutting as anything in David Bentley Hart’s Atheist Delusions.